Skip to Main Content

Migration to Microservices-based architectures: Success stories

Migration Migration to Microservices

Until recently, the monolithic architecture model was the standard in most companies. However, its numerous limitations, such as lack of flexibility and scalability, make it difficult for organizations to adapt to increasingly demanding environments. As a result, monolithic architecture has become less attractive to companies looking to respond quickly to market needs. Here’s where the migration to microservices comes to mind.

In this context, microservices have gained significant relevance. Although not a new concept, their ability to meet a wide range of needs and their constant evolution has made them a key strategic option for many companies looking to improve operational efficiency.

Introduction to Microservices

As mentioned earlier, microservices are not a recent concept. Their origins date back to the late 1990s and early 2000s, with Service-Oriented Architecture (SOA) and Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB).

The term “microservice” was formally used for the first time in May 2011 during a workshop with software architects near Venice. Later, in May 2012, the same group decided to adopt it to describe their experiences in developing modular systems, and by 2014, the term had become widely recognized.

What is a Microservice?

As the name suggests, a microservice is a small, independent service unit that performs specific tasks within a larger system. Each microservice operates autonomously and communicates with others through well-defined APIs.

This approach allows developers to modify the system without having to change the entire architecture, facilitating scalability, agile deployment of new functionalities, and system resilience.

Microservices Architecture Patterns

Implementing microservices architecture patterns helps businesses address challenges inherent in modular models. These patterns provide greater security in application design, as they are tested and verified models that ensure simplicity in development while offering clear guidance.

Advantages of Microservices

1. Service Orchestration

In this pattern, a central component known as an orchestrator manages and coordinates interactions between different microservices to complete a specific business process. The orchestrator determines the sequence of calls and manages the workflow logic, ensuring that each service runs in the correct order.

This centralized approach makes it easier to manage complex processes and implement distributed services effectively.

2. Service Choreography

Unlike orchestration, choreography is a decentralized approach where each microservice interacts with others by emitting and listening to events. There is no central controller; instead, each service responds to events and may generate new ones that other services will consume.

This pattern promotes low coupling and greater service autonomy, but it requires careful management to avoid complexities in event flow.

3. API Gateway

The API Gateway pattern introduces a single entry point for external requests to the microservices system. This gateway handles tasks such as request routing, authentication, authorization, load balancing, and response aggregation from multiple services.

By centralizing these functions, it simplifies communication between clients and microservices, enhances security, and makes version management easier.

4. Service Discovery

In dynamic environments where microservice instances can scale or change, the service discovery pattern enables microservices to locate and communicate with each other without requiring static configurations.

This is achieved through a centralized registry, where services register and discover dynamically, facilitating scalability and resilience.

5. SAGA

The SAGA pattern manages distributed transactions by breaking them into a series of smaller, autonomous transactions, each with a compensating operation to revert its effect in case of failure.

This ensures eventual consistency without requiring prolonged locks, which is essential in distributed systems where traditional transactions are not viable.

6. Event Sourcing

This pattern involves storing an application’s state as a sequence of immutable events instead of as a current data snapshot. Each state change is recorded as an event, and the current state is rebuilt by replaying these events.

This provides a complete history of changes, facilitates auditing, and allows reconstruction of previous system states.

7. Event-Driven Architecture (EDA)

In an EDA, microservices primarily communicate through events. A service emits an event when a significant action occurs, and other services subscribe and react accordingly.

This pattern promotes loose coupling and greater flexibility and scalability in service-to-service communication.

8. CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation)

CQRS is a pattern that separates read and write operations into different models. This allows for independent optimization of each operation, improving performance and scalability.

It is particularly useful in systems where read and write workloads are asymmetrical or have different requirements.

9. Backend for Frontend (BFF)

The BFF pattern involves creating a custom backend layer for each client type (for example, web or mobile). This layer acts as an intermediary between the frontend and microservices, adapting responses and aggregating data based on client-specific needs.

This improves user experience and reduces complexity on the frontend.

10. Outbox

The Outbox pattern ensures consistency between a database and messages sent to other services.

When a service performs an operation that must notify others, it first stores the message in an outbox table within the same transaction as the main operation. A separate process then reads these messages and sends them, ensuring they are not lost due to intermediate failures.

The following article might interest you: Migration Checklist: 5 steps to success in your data and system migration plan

Comparing Microservices and Monolithic Architectures

Now that we have defined key aspects of microservices architecture, it is important to compare it with monolithic architecture, a more traditional software development approach.

What is Monolithic Architecture?

As mentioned earlier, monolithic architecture was, until recently, the dominant approach for software development and management in many companies. In this architecture, all system components are tightly integrated and dependent on each other.

This means that any modification, bug fix, or update requires changes to the entire codebase, making development slower and more complex over time.

The inherent limitations of this architecture restrict developer flexibility and hinder application scalability. Due to these challenges, many companies have adopted microservices for modern projects.

Monolithic vs. Microservices Architecture

While microservices architecture offers multiple benefits, it also presents certain challenges that must be considered. One of the main difficulties is the complexity of planning and development, as it requires a precise roadmap to ensure proper communication between different services.

Additionally, implementing effective monitoring and governance systems is essential to maintain infrastructure control and ensure optimal performance. Without proper planning and design, the benefits of microservices can be overshadowed by management difficulties.

However, when implemented correctly, businesses can develop scalable, flexible applications that adapt to market challenges, enabling faster innovation and efficiency.

Comparison Table: Monolithic vs. Microservices

Feature Monolithic Microservices
Structure A single application with all modules in one codebase. A collection of independent services communicating with each other.
Scalability Vertical scaling (increasing resources on one server). Horizontal scaling (adding more instances of specific services).
Maintenance Can become complex over time as code grows. Easier maintenance and updates in individual services.
Deployment Requires full application deployment for every change. Each service can be deployed independently.
Resilience A failure in one module can impact the entire application. Failures in one service do not necessarily affect others.
Development Speed Initially faster, but slows down over time due to complexity. More modular and efficient for distributed teams.
Cost Lower initial cost. More cost-efficient for infrastructure and maintenance in the long run.

Optimize communication between your Microservices with Chakray

Key Factors for Migration

Before deciding to migrate from a monolithic architecture to microservices, it is crucial to assess key factors such as:

  • Scalability: Whether the current application can efficiently support user growth or increased transactions.
  • Maintenance and agility: The difficulty of adding new features or fixing bugs within the monolithic architecture.
  • Deployment speed: Whether release cycles are slow due to the need to deploy the entire application with each change.
  • Dependencies and coupling: A high level of interdependency between modules, which can hinder system evolution.
  • Business requirements: Whether the company needs greater flexibility for innovation and faster response times.
  • Infrastructure costs: Evaluating whether adopting microservices can reduce operational costs in the cloud by utilizing on-demand resources.

Procedure for Migrating to Microservices

Migrating to microservices architecture is a complex, long-term process that requires careful planning, evaluation, and execution. Below are the exact steps to follow for a smooth transition.

1. Evaluating the Existing Monolithic Architecture

Before beginning the migration, it is essential to fully understand the structure and functionality of the current monolithic application. This involves:

  • Mapping dependencies: Identifying interactions and dependencies between modules and components.
  • Functionality analysis: Determining critical parts of the application, frequently used components, and those that would benefit the most from migration to microservices.
  • Database evaluation: Understanding how data is managed, what schemas are used, and how tables are related.

2. Migration Strategies (Big Bang vs. Incremental Approach)

When transitioning from monolithic architecture to microservices, two main approaches exist:

A. Big Bang Migration

As the name suggests, this approach involves rewriting the entire application into microservices in a single phase. While it may seem like a fast and direct solution, it comes with significant risks:

  • High costs and long development times, as it requires detailed planning and complete reconstruction before deployment.
  • Greater complexity and potential for errors, which could impact system stability if interactions are not thoroughly tested.
  • Resistance to change, as teams must adapt to new architecture and tools all at once.

This approach is more viable for smaller applications or when the current architecture is too rigid for a progressive migration.

B. Incremental Migration

This method involves gradually breaking down the monolithic application into modules, migrating them progressively, starting with less critical components and moving towards core functionalities.

Key advantages include:

  • Lower risk, as testing and validation can be done at each stage without disrupting the system.
  • Flexibility and adaptability, making it easier to identify and correct errors early.
  • Minimal business disruption, allowing users to continue using parts of the system during the transition.

Incremental migration is the recommended approach for complex or production systems, as it ensures a smoother transformation without affecting business operations.

Need assistance with your services migration? Contact us!

3. Main Challenges and How to Overcome Them

Despite the numerous benefits microservices offer, several challenges may arise during the migration process. Below are some of the most common issues and strategies to mitigate them.

Challenge 1: Complexity in Breaking Down the Monolith

Dividing a monolithic application into independent microservices can be complex due to tight interdependencies between components. Poor decomposition can result in poorly defined services and an inefficient architecture.

Mitigation Strategy: Apply Domain-Driven Design (DDD) principles to identify bounded contexts and establish clear boundaries between services. This approach ensures that microservices are cohesive and have well-defined responsibilities.

Challenge 2: Managing Communication and Latency Between Services

In a microservices architecture, communication between services occurs through network calls, which can introduce latency issues and failures in interactions.

Mitigation Strategy: Implement asynchronous communication patterns using message queues or event-driven systems like RabbitMQ or Apache Kafka to reduce direct dependencies and improve resilience.

Challenge 3: Ensuring Data Consistency and Managing Distributed Transactions

Each microservice typically has its own database, making it difficult to maintain data consistency across services. This can lead to integrity issues and incoherent information.

Mitigation Strategy: Adopt SAGA patterns to manage distributed transactions, where a sequence of local transactions is coordinated to maintain eventual consistency. Additionally, implementing event sourcing can ensure all services share a consistent data state.

Success Stories in Microservices Migration

Many leading companies have successfully migrated from monolithic to microservices architecture, improving scalability, flexibility, and innovation capabilities. Below are some outstanding examples:

Case Study 1: Netflix

In 2008, after a database failure caused a service outage, Netflix decided to migrate from a monolithic architecture to microservices. This transition allowed them to efficiently manage exponential user growth and meet the increasing demand for video streaming services.

By breaking down their application into independent services, Netflix achieved:

  • Greater resilience
  • Faster updates and deployments
  • Enhanced stability to prevent service crashes

Case Study 2: Amazon

Originally built as an online bookstore, Amazon expanded significantly in its product catalog and transaction volume. To manage this complexity, they transitioned from monolithic to microservices architecture.

This shift enabled Amazon to:

  • Independently scale different platform components (e.g., inventory, payments, product recommendations)
  • Introduce new features more rapidly
  • Improve operational efficiency

Case Study 3: Spotify

Spotify, the popular music streaming platform, adopted microservices to improve agility in developing and deploying new features.

By doing so, their development teams could focus on specific components like:

  • Playlist management
  • Personalized recommendations
  • Seamless audio streaming

This architecture allowed Spotify to scale efficiently and quickly respond to user needs.

Case Study 4: Uber

Initially, Uber operated on a monolithic system, handling core functions like:

  • Matching drivers with passengers
  • Billing
  • Payments

As the company expanded globally, this architecture became insufficient. Transitioning to microservices helped Uber improve:

  • Real-time fare calculation
  • Driver assignment efficiency
  • Scalability for different markets

Conclusion

Migrating from monolithic architectures to microservices offers major operational and logistical advantages, especially for large companies seeking agility, scalability, and flexibility. This approach allows businesses to make changes and improvements without affecting the entire codebase or compromising system stability.

Key Takeaways for a Successful Migration

  • Evaluate the existing infrastructure to identify dependencies, bottlenecks, and challenges
  • Choose the right migration strategy (incremental migration is usually the safest approach)
  • Select the right technologies for monitoring, orchestration, and communication, ensuring long-term maintenance and efficient data exchange

At Chakray, we approach each migration with a structured strategy, ensuring a tailored transition aligned with your business objectives.

If you are considering migrating to microservices, contact us today. Our team is ready to assist you at every stage of the process.

Talk to our experts!

Contact our team and discover the cutting-edge technologies that will empower your business.

contact us